Cat-eat Crunch?

Our cats are quite particular about what they eat, they like Whiskas or Felix and only certain flavours, but I’m always on the look out for something to give them a bit of variety. Today in Somerfield I was casting my eyes down the cat food aisle and noticed something.

Normally cat food shows a picture of a happy energetic looking cat on the front (which is odd as there aren’t pictures of humans on the front of our food) something like this:

Go Cat

Go-Cat is quite an established brand, they’ve been using this boo-alike for some time – he looks springy, bright-eyed and desperate to eat those crunchy cereal things.

Contrast that with the cat on the supermarket own-brand food:

sad somerfield cat

Sad, longing and somehow not looking forward to the chunks or the gravy. Even the gourmet cat is affected by the black dog of depression. The ennui of the pedigree:

gourment sad

He’s also a little out of focus. It’s catching, this poor kitten cant even rouse the enthusiasm (despite New & Improved Recipes) to list his head towards the noms.

sad cat pink nose

It might be the case that cats getting no-frills food might not be quite as pleased when it’s mealtime, but you’d think it wouldn’t be too hard to get a snap of one that was getting salmon filets, grinning from ear to ear and purring like a well-tuned engine?

Bad Science needs help, or at least link love

Ben Goldacre has had a nastygram from LBC 97.3 and “Global Radio” over posting audio of what he describes as “Jeni Barnett’s MMR scaremongering”. If you’re in a position to help, it would be appreciated. – Bad Science needs help, or at least link love.

Glasvegas

Have the look of the band of 2009 – as imagined in a British film from the early nineties. They’re various old punk scenesters playing the future Jesus and Mary chain. The set is straight from Jude Law’s forgotten dystopian master-work ‘Shopping’ – desolate monolithic council flats rumble bass and flash neon.

They’ve only got one song. It goes thump thump thump woo oooh. Works though.

A thought about Twitter that is a bit longer that 140 chars

This is likely to be incoherent — which is why, despite it being about social media, it isn’t over on jonbounds.co.uk — I’m trying to define why I (amongst others) are starting to worry that we’re falling out with Twitter. I’m not going to attempt to explain stuff, just have to dump this out of my head. I’m still working this stuff out, and I’m just thinking around the reasons why I can sometimes feel uncomfortable.

It’s something that I tried to define on the B’ham Post blog, about why online social networks fall apart after a certain stage – I posited that it was something to do with people reaching their Dunbar number and the social pressure that comes from ostentatiously limiting your network:

“There’s a number called Dunbar’s Number (it’s cited to be around 150, but isn’t strictly defined) and it reflects the limit of the number of people with which you can maintain social relationships. Online you might find this number slightly higher, you may just be good at “maintaining social relationships” or you may be able to “keep in touch” with more people if many of them don’t spend much time on that particular social network. But eventually your network size will strain at Dunbar’s Number and you’ll have to start making decisions:

“Do I accept that friend request? I don’t really know them well, but don’t like to offend them by ignoring it.” “Can I delete the contact that I don’t talk to as much any more? But they’ll know I have, I can’t just casually drift off.” “I don’t really like that bloke from work, but it’ll be awkward if I don’t accept him as a friend.”

And the easiest decision is not to use that social network, no more complicated bits of social etiquette to fall over. So people are off to BookFace or MyThing or whatever is next.”

But, while I think that’s true, and it’s certainly something I’ve considered when deciding whether or not to follow people on Twitter, it’s not the whole story.

I’d like to say at this point that I’m not one hundred percent sure that Twitter is what we call a Social Network, due to its asynchronous following/friend structure — it’s more some kind of “always on” ambient messaging network, a hybrid of online forums, email and text messaging. But, by the by, it does support networks, so we see network effects like those I described above.

It seems churlish to moan about adoption of a tool that we’ve all been heaping praise and overwrought social analysis on, but it does create problems. Problems that will have to be dealt with, if we’re to get over the hump:

  • The “mainstream” explosion creates a great deal of noise, whether it’s your contacts talking about @stephenfry, to @stephenfry or sending messages that contain the word @stephenfry in the hope that he’ll notice (or just for fun). Filtering mechanisms just can’t filter this stuff reliably — what you’re in the mood for at any one time varies too much.
  • Use by the “offline famous” (those bringing in existing, huge, one-way networks) can lead to the system being overloaded by “broadcasting” — people falling over themselves to re-tweet the messages of the famous. At this point I’d say that the “online famous” can be guilty of this too, but they usually understand the power of it more, and if they still “broadcast” then they’re not worth bothering with.
  • Until this point I’ve managed to remove Chris Moyles from my life by not listening to radio one, and quickly making by distaste for him known whenever people mention him to me — they soon learn not to. But can you reasonably do that when the messaging system is built to be so ambient? Not really. I have no influence over people I’d otherwise love to follow.

But can’t you just “not follow” people? No, not really:

So stop telling me that I can just ignore changes I’m uncomfortable with to a tool that I’ve spent a lot of time using and building up knowledge with. I’m not suggesting that widespread adoption is a bad thing, just that the tool we’ve been using has no filters — filters that exist more naturally in the real world, and aren’t needed so much in the different messaging systems that “social networks” have provided.

Twitter is different because there isn’t any “other stuff”, no different places for different types of conversation. No interest grouping, no one-to-one spaces, no filters. That’s why, so far it’s worked so well, and why it may trancend “website” and become something more, but it’s also a problem.

Stephen Fry stuck in a lift

TwitPic - Share photos on twitter
Uploaded with plasq‘s Skitch!

Stephen Fry is stuck in a lift. Now will this cause Twitpic as much touble as the plane in a river?
TwitPic – Share photos on twitter

Charlton and the “reallies?”

TV critic and now TV star Charlie Brooker is on Twitter, he calls himself CharltonBrooker, you can tell it’s him no-one else could get enough bile into 140 characters. He’s an old-school computo-phile (he used to write about computer games, and indeed the computer magazines of the eighties were a fabulous breeding ground for journalists), so instead of the fumbling of most new Twitter users he was straight in using desktop clients and — most excitingly crowdsourcing an article.

Twitter / Charlie Brooker: NOWTRAGE (nowt-rage) - Nou ...
Uploaded with plasq‘s Skitch!

This was to be the first definition in his “new” media dictionary — and he was asking for contributions. Except that he eventually got cold feet and decided he couldn’t use any in the finished article.

Twitter / Charlie Brooker: Actually prob can't really ...
Uploaded with plasq‘s Skitch!

Which is understandable, I guess, given the current “nowtrage” over anything from Twitter. But at least it’s a step up from people asking if it’s really him (if it wasn’t the skill of the tweeter would make it interesting anyway). But anyway, some of those definitions sent in to him deserve a wider audience — you can sieve through all tweets sent to Mr Brooker here — so here are a few of my favourites.

nickpeters: @charltonbrooker COTTONMOUTH: condition where presenter must claim even the most bland performance is ‘Amazing!’ and ‘Rock And Roll’
supercoolkp: @charltonbrooker Darticle – an broadcast item so infuriating, it makes you want to throw sharp things at it.
steve_nicholls: @charltonbrooker Wikipediaphiles – lazy arsed journalists who do all their research at the online One Stop Shop for info.
bounder: @charltonbrooker “necropile” TV shedule stacking with the work of a recently deceased actor
bounder: @charltonbrooker “commershill” a once great person who throws their credibility away for advert cash. cf Iggy Pop sells insurance

iPhoto sees people everywhere

I’ve been playing with the new iPhoto ’09, it’s major selling point is face recognition — it attempts to spot faces in your photos and keep a record of who’s where. It makes some brave attempts, but doesn’t always make it:

First it spotted a face in Bearwood High St.

iPhoto - Bearwood High St Has a Face
Uploaded with plasq‘s Skitch!

Then it saw faces, lots of them, but didn’t connect them together.
Read More »

Feed Me



Feed Me Originally uploaded by bounder

After waiting for about 2 weeks longer than normal for my RSS badges from Badges for Bands, I asked where they were.

Postal trouble it seems, so they sent me another load (and I think popped a few more in for good measure) — well recomended.

Seven things you’re not at all interested in

I don’t usually take part in these blog tagging things, normally because they tell you to write about yourself. Now I’ll admit that a lot of things I write (here, on the work-type blog, on BiNS, on the Birmingham Post blog, wherever anyone lets me) are tinged with personal thoughts, experiences and the like — but they’re not about me.

I’m quite a dull person, much happier cocooned away in my own world of rarely-completed conceptual art and worrying about where the next fiver is coming from than doing anything as extrovert as diary writing. That said, having spent a good portion of Saturday willingly annoying Michael by calling him: first Mike, then Mick, then Mickey, I feel I should play along with his game too.

So the concept is, seven facts that people don’t already know about me. Let’s go.

  1. I don’t listen to Radio 4, hardly at all.. It’s a heresy to admit it in some circles, but I don’t listen to Today, or World at One, nor intriguing documentaries about the plight of indigenous peoples. I’m so rarely in the mood for that sort of stuff and habits long-formed are for music radio, or football-based speech. I don’t get on with recorded material, time-shifting audio doesn’t move me. That said I’ll listen to Hitchhikers over and over again, keep up with the Archers, and I’ve got Radio 4 on now — I’m too busy to get up and switch over.
  2. I have seen Star Wars — well, a bit of it. I’ll often tell people that I’ve neither seen, nor have any interest in Star Wars, Indiana Jones or Lords of the Rings — and it’s true. I’ll accept that Star Ward has has a huge impact on popular culture (so large in fact that I now see no reason to watch it, the plot characters and iconography are freely available), but I missed the time and there are so many more interesting things to be catching up on. But when about ten  on holiday at a Pontins hotel in Margate they showed Star Wars One at midnight, in the ballroom, on a projector screen no bigger than a double bed-sheet. I watched a bit at the start — robots in a desert — dozed off bored, and was put to bed.
  3. Although an atheist, there was a time when I went to Church twice a week. I went to a Church of England School in Handsworth, St Mary’s, the churchyard of which has many of the Lunar Society buried in. It wasn’t a particularly religious school, certainly not Christian religious (more Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, everything but), but we did have to go to a proper Church service on a Wednesday. Couple this with my joining the Boys Brigade (mainly to play football), and its compulsory attendance at Perry Barr Methodist Church on Sunday, and I was numbing-my-bum on pews for at least two hours a week up till the age of 11.
  4. I had to have remedial spelling and handwriting lessons at secondary school. Odd for a person who has moved from journalism to publishing to writing down almost all my thoughts on the Internet, but sure enough I was taken out of Geography lessons on Tuesdays and given whatever was the literacy equivalent of electric shock treatment for an hour. It didn’t work, and I still don’t fully understand what an ox-bow lake is.
  5. I was invited to join the Central Kids Televison Drama Group, but didn’t go. I showed no mean talent for acting in my youth, and was sent a letter inviting me to go to the TV studios on Saturday mornings to do drama stuff. My dad told me I could choose between that and football, so my drama career was over. It was the route that a kid from school took to being in Crossroads and eventually becoming the “did she just shake her tic-tacs at me?” guy — I coulda been a contender!

  6. I used to support the Villa. Indeed, yes, I know. While I was born in the shaddow of the Trinity Road stand (or at least within earshot of the roar of the Holte), I was brought up a Blues fan by my Dad who had spent his formative years living in St Andrews Road. But in the coming years I was brainwashed into becoming claret and blue by my Granddad (Mum’s side) and uncles — Villa winning the League and then the European Cup (I have a photo of me with it) as I was growing up didn’t hurt either.By 18 I had a Villa Park season ticket (even so I still spent some Saturdays on the Spion Kop).My best mate, guitarist in my band, and bluenose killed himself a few years after that — I went to a very dark place, and when I came out I supported the Blues. Maybe something to do with attempting to replace him, and I’m sure psychiatrists would have a field day if I believed in them.
  7. I don’t like vegetables. A hardship for a vegetarian, but I don’t like carrots, peas, any type of beans, swedes, turnips, parsnips. I like fake meat and fruit. It’s Linda McCartney sausages and tinned tomatoes for tea.

I’m meant to nominate seven other people to do this now, but I did this because I felt like it (and a sort of Rabbit Hole Day entry a bit late) so although I’ll list them I don’t care at all if they do it. Julia GilbertAbby Corfan, Danny Smith, Stuart Parker, Mark Steadman, TWM_Driver (now he has no buses to write about) and Deirdre Alden.

Momus on Matt McGinn

Scottish songwriter and aesthete Momus on Matt McGinn — “communist, atheist, republican, and perhaps Scotland’s most interesting satirical songwriter”

[youtube:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hUogk0VhaQQ]