<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the bounder &#187; writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebounder.co.uk</link>
	<description>the home for all of jon bounds&#039;s nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='thebounder.co.uk' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m about to spend two weeks in a car in the name of art</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/931/why-im-about-to-spend-two-weeks-in-a-car-in-the-name-of-art/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/931/why-im-about-to-spend-two-weeks-in-a-car-in-the-name-of-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[my projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Bristow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I write, you know, it&#8217;s sort of the core of loads of stuff I do—writing is a founding block of good social web engagement which is where I get most of my living from. It&#8217;s also part of teaching or training in a way, you need to be able to construct narratives and find the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write, you know, it&#8217;s sort of the core of loads of stuff I do—writing is a founding block of good social web engagement which is where I get most of my living from. It&#8217;s also part of teaching or training in a way, you need to be able to construct narratives and find the right words. Journalism, or at least the writing of words to order for publication, is fun too. But the writing that&#8217;s most rewarding is where you get to have an idea, and then run with the bugger until it&#8217;s done.</p>
<p><a href="http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/884/the-king-and-i-%E2%80%94%C2%A0my-elvis-marathon/">Listening to all six hundred and ninety eight Elvis Presley songs in order in one sitting</a> was one of those, but <a href="http://dirtybristow.co.uk/">Dirty Bristow</a> was sort of like that on a grand scale, and not just me writing.</p>
<p>When you look around there seems to be a straight choice for writers: the web and freedom (but no guaranteed audience or context) or whatever publication will have you and whatever rules they apply. Not that rules are bad: it&#8217;s not just the subject/audience/word count stuff that&#8217;s the problem, it&#8217;s the context and the pressure of it. Want to discuss South American literature and pop-culture in the same breath? You&#8217;ll be too worried that not everyone will get it, waste the word count explaining things and end up with something without the élan you wanted.</p>
<p>So we invented a magazine with as few rules and pressures as possible, it seems (artistically at least) to work. That sorted what&#8217;s the next challenge?</p>
<p>Piers.</p>
<p>Or to be specific, nostalgia for a lost and fictional time and piers are a good knob to hang this particular type upon.</p>
<p>Danny Smith, with whom I&#8217;d managed to hold out against the advice and make the magazine, said there was something in a book visiting all of the pleasure piers in Britain. He didn&#8217;t know how many there were, how long that would take, but it sounded good. I said yes, and then basically a lot of people said &#8216;no&#8217;. Or rather they said &#8220;don&#8217;t do it&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;m not coming&#8221;, &#8220;that&#8217;s stupid&#8221;, &#8220;why?&#8221; or most devastatingly of all for Dan &#8220;you&#8217;re wasting your life&#8221; (his mum).</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re going to do it anyway. We&#8217;ve researched a bit, and know where they are. We&#8217;ve press-ganged a driver—I say so my creative stance isn&#8217;t diluted, my friend says &#8220;so your drinking isn&#8217;t interrupted&#8221; and she&#8217;s possibly half right. But it&#8217;s more so I don&#8217;t have to worry so much.</p>
<p>I love new places, but find that travel can be a trial, even if arriving is a pleasure.</p>
<p>I get nervous: sit on a train, is it the right train? Is it working? Have I go the right ticket?  What if it doesn&#8217;t stop at the right place? What if it breaks down, what if… No, I can&#8217;t relax. Not til all decisions have been taken off me—which is sort of why I can cope a lot more easily with the regimented walk/don&#8217;t walk watch-the-screens travel by air. I mean, they&#8217;re actively trying to make sure you don&#8217;t get on the wrong plane—and the consequences of a break-down are a little more final than having to spend the night on Crewe Station.</p>
<p>So if I don&#8217;t have to think, and the worst thing that can happen is that I die, I&#8217;m good.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a point or an allegory for the journey, certainly not one as deeply thought out and <a href="http://edgetrinkets.com/2011/08/01/my-new-brilliant-dumb-project-pier-review/">involving the A-Team as m&#8217;colleague Mr Smith</a> has. Nor am I thinking about group dynamics in a wider sense than I don&#8217;t really want to have a row with either of them. I&#8217;m not looking for conflict or hardship: the last thing I want is for this tale to turn into one of struggle, of dirty sleeping conditions or danger. We might find some, but I&#8217;m more interested in the ghosts of the past.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s something we&#8217;ve lost culturally, it&#8217;s like a love that&#8217;s gone and hurts. The empty past leaves you constantly hungry around the heart: it’s true to call it an ache but there are sharp pains too. There&#8217;ll be explosions of emptiness, like going over a humpbacked bridge too fast.</p>
<p>Inspirationally, for me the trip is a mirror world version of <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Wisdom-Lighthouse-Top-World/dp/184068108X">Drummond and Manning&#8217;s Bad Wisdom</a> series. In that two differing writers travel to the unknown, testing themselves and their sanity—we&#8217;re hunting the familiar in a county that is changing faster than we can cope with. Except that instead of two independently wealthy ex-pop stars, we&#8217;re two people without two pots to rub together; having spent what little spare we had on the magazine itself.</p>
<p>People have been kind, we&#8217;ve had offers of support and places to kip as well as a surprisingly quick race to the (low admittedly) Crowdfunding target. Thanks everybody.</p>
<p>If you want to check out something similar, there&#8217;s the much smaller scale trip we did around <a href="http://dirtybristow.co.uk/2011/07/a-free-bristow-e-book-concrete-and-cocktails/">Birmingham&#8217;s pubs Concrete and Cocktails that you can download</a> for nowt.</p>
<p>More details of how to help or get involved in this madness are here: <a href="http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/investment/pier-review-a-book-about-a-journey-to-the-outcrops-of-a-dying-culture-311">http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/investment/pier-review-a-book-about-a-journey-to-the-outcrops-of-a-dying-culture-311</a></p>
<p>Twitter – <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/PierReview">@Pierreview</a><br />
Facebook – <a href="http://on.fb.me/oDGIJZ">Facebook.com/PierReview</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/931/why-im-about-to-spend-two-weeks-in-a-car-in-the-name-of-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funny, ha ha.</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/898/funny-ha-ha/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/898/funny-ha-ha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ability to make people laugh has always been something that is fairly central to my personality. I&#8217;m not entirely sure why, but it wasn&#8217;t for cliched make-the-bullies-laugh at school reasons, because I did—and they still hit me.  That was a lot more to do with me being obviously poorer and shyer in a school [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability to make people laugh has always been something that is fairly central to my personality. I&#8217;m not entirely sure why, but it wasn&#8217;t for cliched make-the-bullies-laugh at school reasons, because I did—and they still hit me. </p>
<p>That was a lot more to do with me being obviously poorer and shyer in a school full of the confident entitled. And a bit of a dick, I&#8217;ve always been a bit of a dick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wary of being seen to be taking anything overly seriously, or being unable to break the tension with a quip. Confrontation so rarely solves anything, so if you can dodge it all the better and that has something to do with it but there&#8217;s a streak of performance and the need for validation in there too.</p>
<p>Writing gentle satire, or being amusing around strict parameters is easy—there are hundreds of people doing it fairly competently around the country every day. Creativity is different though, if you have to come up with the ideas rather than react to situations, if you decide that adaption of existing jokes to the situation isn&#8217;t what you want to do, if you want to be funny without it relying on reference, then it&#8217;s somewhat harder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done plenty of compering, quizes, awards, that sort of thing, where a tiny bit of wit will do wonders to prop up the &#8216;turns&#8217;. I&#8217;ve also injected the odd bit of humour into the various other bits of public speaking I do as part of &#8216;work&#8217;, that&#8217;s easy and really does help get the point across. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve not done is stand-up comedy. </p>
<p>Well, not until last week. When I, er did.</p>
<p>Stand-up is the purest form of entertainment, it&#8217;s just one person talking, and that&#8217;s exciting. It&#8217;s also quite scary, and difficult. I&#8217;ve always thought that I&#8217;d like to and would be able to, but have never got round to doing anything.</p>
<p>Part of the reticence has been because no-one is pushing me to do it, I&#8217;ve got plenty of creative outlets and it&#8217;s just another one. Putting myself forward to do even an open slot somewhere seems boastful somehow, I&#8217;d need proof that I could do it. Partly it&#8217;s that I want to be great at whatever I try, and as an art form it doesn&#8217;t offer many safety features: no-one can really tell how comedy is going to go down, and a silence at a stand-up gig leaves no hiding place.</p>
<p>All of which is why that, despite being bad at learning (or being taught, rather), I signed up for a course in stand-up a couple of months ago. I&#8217;d seen James Cook, the tutor, perform: being accomplished, funny, and obviously in control of an audience. There was stuff I could learn there, and I also had a vague feeling that the pressure to produce material might help my other writing.</p>
<p>I can write, I think, it doesn&#8217;t usually take me that long to produce something when I sit down to do it—but the time it takes me to actually start is sometimes a problem. I can only work well when inspiration strikes, or when a deadline is looming, and usually manage it by not attempting to work when I don&#8217;t feel right. I&#8217;m not going to do it, I figure, so I can get on with other stuff until the time comes. It&#8217;s a solution, but not a good one, and I thought perhaps that working on stuff across a couple of months could really help.</p>
<p>The other people on the course, run from a windowless but expensively carpeted conference room at mac, were a mixture of those that were thinking of doing it professionally eventually and those that just thought it might be fun. All were obviously comedy fans, which I guess you&#8217;d have to be. </p>
<p>Alongside exercises, bits of stuff about things like mic technique, there were a couple of great sessions from comedians Andy White and Gary Delaney where they talked about how they worked and how they got started. The main thread of the sessions, though, was practical: listening to others trying out material and, when I could pluck up the courage, doing a bit myself.</p>
<p>I actually found this much more difficult than the more theoretical stuff. I didn&#8217;t want to say anything that would nudge people away from their own paths, I was worried about a homogenising effect with 14-15 would-be stand-ups working on routines in the same environment. It didn&#8217;t happen, without too much thought about style people seemed to find their own ways.</p>
<p>By the end-of-term showcase, in front of about 80 people, everyone on the course had enough stuff. Some had way too much and squeezed it into their allotted five minutes. It was an incredibly supportive audience, and each comic went down well.</p>
<p>I did struggle with material, I was after something that was sort of simultaneously clever and accessible and I couldn&#8217;t find anything I was happy with. In the end I&#8217;m not sure if I didn&#8217;t chicken out and go for easy laughs. I&#8217;m not sure I respect me as a stand-up, I think I can do it but I&#8217;m not sure if I can do it as well as I&#8217;d want to. I think I&#8217;ll wait for the big idea before having another go.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the fault of the course, which was really great and <a href="http://www.macarts.co.uk/page/3718/Performing+Arts/744">runs again in January</a>. You&#8217;ll enjoy it if you have a go, I promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/898/funny-ha-ha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The King and I — my Elvis Marathon.</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/884/the-king-and-i-%e2%80%94%c2%a0my-elvis-marathon/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/884/the-king-and-i-%e2%80%94%c2%a0my-elvis-marathon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[my projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pleased to have one less thing in common with the Wonder Stuff, I do love Elvis. I love the hillbilly cat and the jumpsuited entertainer, and to prevent disillusionment I find it fairly easy to avoid watching the films — it&#8217;s not as if they are in heavy rotation on our mainstream channels these days. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pleased to have one less thing in common  with the Wonder Stuff, I do love Elvis. I love the hillbilly cat and the  jumpsuited entertainer, and to prevent disillusionment I find it fairly  easy to avoid watching the films — it&#8217;s not as if they are in heavy  rotation on our mainstream channels these days. A love for the King is  an isolating love these days. Elvis has become a rubber hat and plastic  sunglasses, a jumpsuit and a remix opportunity. Elvis has become, like  every dead musical artist worth remembering, a tribute and moneymaking  sinkhole.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m as much to blame as anybody, I own an officially licensed <em>Blue Hawaii</em> Hawaiian shirt (see what they did there?), an &#8216;Elvis pig&#8217; (in  mitigation, a gift), and book-after-book both scurrilous and fanboy. But  I love the King, it&#8217;s where me and Chuck D part company (&#8220;Elvis was a  hero to most, but he never meant shit to me&#8221;) and one of the few  touchstones that I&#8217;m sure I would have with bum-sex comedian Frank  Skinner (who paid silly money for a shirt that may have belonged to  EAP).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a love based on the iconography as much as the music, the  belts and glasses as much as the sultry vocals, That’s The Way It Is as  much as the Carson show and really; ’75 as much as ’56. We’re around the  33rd anniversary of the death of Elvis Aaron Presley, and if there’s  anything more undignifying than “dying on the toilet” it’s Elvis Week  2010. A week long excuse to bombard fans with emails for inglorious tat:  <a href="http://clicks1.musictoday.com/cts/click?q=1;111068;47i0ru6kLYQfdumoOk3BKOWcvXryet1C&amp;src=NEWS111068">Jailhouse Rock Flip Flops</a>, the <a href="http://clicks1.musictoday.com/cts/click?q=1;111068;47i0ru6kLYSGdc59gZ1ez6lDkuIg76BK&amp;src=NEWS111068">Elvis Hot Sauce Sauce Gift Set</a> (including <a href="http://www.shopelvis.com/Product.aspx?cp=796_39285&amp;pc=EPAM0390">Elvis Don’t Be Cruel Hot Sauce</a>), the <a href="http://www.shopelvis.com/Product.aspx?cp=796_39285&amp;pc=EPAM1856">Elvis and Dale Earnhardt Fantasy Race Car Magnetic Guitar Bottle Opener</a> and left over <a href="http://www.shopelvis.com/Product.aspx?cp=796_11977&amp;pc=EPAM2223">Elvis Week 2009 Golf Balls</a>. But, there’s still the music. In October a new <em>Elvis Complete Masters</em> 30 CD set is being released at the paltry sum of about £573.78 plus  shipping, containing all 711 master recordings and a hundred or so  rarities — no better way to make sure that it’s the music that matters.</p>
<p><a title="Elvises by bounder, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bounder/48561859/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/26/48561859_1339592e4a.jpg" alt="Elvises" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>I couldn’t justify a pre-order for that,  but I could beg and borrow all studio recordings released to date—and I  can listen to all six hundred and ninety-eight of them in order. I could  do the listening bit as I was ill with a stodgy cold and home alone as  my other half was away to visit friends for the weekend—had she have  been in situ there would have been no chance of getting through it in a  sitting. A ferociously opinionated music fan, Jules has banned many of  my favourites from play in her presence, mainly what she calls “wimpy  indie music” (The Smiths, Belle and Sebastian, Black Box Recorder  amongst them) but my recent obsession with listening only to covers of  the Stones’ <em>Satisfaction</em> didn’t go down well either.</p>
<p>So I did, I loaded them all into iTunes, ordered by <a href="http://www.sergent.com.au/elvis/sessions.html">recording date as best as I could</a>, from 1953&#8242;s <em>My Happiness</em> to 1976’s recording of <em>Way Down</em> (a posthumous Number One in the UK in 1977). That’s 1.2 days according  to Apple. I started at 1pm on a Saturday, with intentions of attempting  it in one go.</p>
<p><span id="more-884"></span></p>
<p>I wasn’t actually sure what I was  attempting: it had something to do with sorting out my reactions to  Elvis, something to do with wanting to make my own mind up on all those  film soundtracks and deciding if the early years and the Vegas years  were the same guy in anything more than physical body. Also, it was  there, er, they were there, a mountain of Memphis to drag myself up with  the use of ropes and crampons.</p>
<p>The foothills are easy, and seem so far  in the past: the first couple of recordings were self-financed, are  scratched beyond repair, and seem odd song choices if they really were  presents for the venerated mother Presley. They, and almost all Elvis  songs are based on love—romantic love to start with, then there’s the  love of God, you sometimes have to look past the hard headed metaphors  (cows, lots of cows early on. And moons). It’s not until <em>Old Shep</em>,  53 songs in for me and the King that there’s anything other than the  birth of rock and roll. We’ve passed the echoing inventions of Sam  Phillips, heard the bass slapped and the snare ratted, we’ve heard  Elvis’s voice buckle country music out of recognition and into something  dangerous and now it’s time for the dog. I’m a huge fan of epic,  maudlin, Elvis whether it’s lost love (ooh loads), society’s ills (<em>In The Ghetto</em>), eternal damnation (all of the gospel recordings by implication) or a dead pooch.</p>
<p>In the fifties we get the templates for  almost all of Elvis’s later output, and much of everybody else’s too  — there are times, especially in the first big rush of success (<em>Tell Me  Why</em>, 61 songs in) in 1957 where the material available to band isn’t  anywhere near good enough. The vocals hold it together, and it’s a  relief when the gospel recordings start they have a depth and sound less  old—by virtue of sounding ancient to start with— than <em>(Let Me Be Your) Teddy Bear</em> (1957, 76 songs in) et al.</p>
<p>Could anyone of a similar pop standing  (not that there is anyone) pull this off today? Could a major star  change tack and record such openly religious music? Even 80s Dylan  struggled with a Christian phase, maybe a chart-y soul singer could have  a go but it’s unlikey that anyone would have the guts. <em>It Is No Secret (What God Can Do)</em> (68 in) has a wonderful oo-ee-oo at exactly 1:39.</p>
<p>It’s a while &#8217;til we hit real movie detritus, but recordings from <em>Jailhouse Rock</em> offer a deathly foreshadowing of that which is to come—poor lyrics and  simple melodies. It&#8217;ll get worse, but we&#8217;re okay for a while. What was  Elvis in jail for in Jailhouse Rock, are these the stylings of an  innocent man—did he just want to &#8220;stick around&#8221; to &#8220;get [his] kicks&#8221;?  Forget this for a while, I tried to. Like I tried to forget that I&#8217;d  made a terrible error at the Asda before starting the marathon and  bought sugar-filled Pepsi rather than the similar looking  caffeine-and-sweetnered Pepsi Max, a mistake that may well have lead to  my dozing off later during a particularly one-note run of soundtrack  sounds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK4_U-nmXyc"><em>Crawfish</em> from Kid Creole</a> (122 songs in) was, I thought for a while, a new piece of  non-metaphoric Presley. Was it the forerunner of the first few Beatles  songs to leave that basic love/sex pop fascination—a song as dirty as  this about a fish would have been way ahead of its time. Further  reading or actual listening to the words revealed the crawfish to be  &#8216;little Elvis&#8217;, and I was disappointed. By this stage I was keeping a  tally of odd metaphors, three about cows, four moons (three of them  blue) but this the first fish. I lost count eventually while looking for  Elvis Firsts—and as I was so excited to find the classic &#8216;Elvis Talky  Bit&#8217; so early. <em>Are You Lonesome Tonight </em>(1960, 155) is the one  with the &#8220;someone said the World&#8217;s a stage&#8221; line and is the most famous  and best time that the King drops out of character, turns directly to  you and solves your problems.</p>
<p>It finishes on the line &#8220;and then came  act two&#8221; and that&#8217;s a good a point as any to really hit the long dark  movie years of the soul.</p>
<p>Everyone knows that Elvis movies start  okay, with proof that when given the right roles (young punk singers in  the big city, not too much of a stretch) there is acting talent, and  songs that mostly wouldn&#8217;t sound out of place on &#8216;proper&#8217; albums.  Everyone knows that the  movie  business was eventually what killed the King, that Colonel Tom loved  the film deals and the art could go hang. Everyone can point to <em>Elvis&#8217;s Greatest Shit</em> the in-no-way official compilation of the biggest musical atrocities  and say that it&#8217;s almost exclusively from the movie years. <em>Song of the Shrimp</em> (<em>Girls! Girls! Girls! </em>1962, 279) <em>Old MacDonald </em>(<em>Double Trouble </em>1966, 411), and <em>Dominic</em> (<em>Stay Away Joe </em>1967, 485)— a song about a shag-shy bullock—prove that.</p>
<p>But everyone is wrong. A bit.</p>
<p>Without exception, unless I was  hallucinating on Onion Ring-style corn snacks, every film contains at  least one great recording—the single from the album if you will. I  started to save details of these lesser spotted flashes of &#8217;56: <em>Black Star</em> (from <em>Flaming Star</em> 1960, 164) is county cowboy Roy Rogers done right, <em>Charro!</em> (<em>Charro! </em>1968, 489) is the title track from his only non-singing role film and has a Joe Meek-eque production that really works.</p>
<p>In the days of limited media access, it&#8217;s  frightening to think that the films were the only way you&#8217;d glimpse  your favourite artist, and the awful soundtrack albums with terrible  artwork. There no wonder that a whole pop and rock tradition built up  while he was away. I took many an opportunity to pop to the toilet  around this time.</p>
<p>The bad-film era does give us the first  real batch of those gospel classics—enough to keep me going until the  promised land of 1968. The &#8217;68 special is, by some, held up as Elvis  Presley&#8217;s last great work, but I find it a rehash of stuff that had gone  before. Necessary to cleanse the palette perhaps, but nothing new  recorded around this time has any great worth, we really do need to wait  for the full big band sound to get into place before he becomes great  again. I&#8217;ve been listening for over 24 hours now (I did drop off, but  restarted at last remembered song) and I&#8217;m aching for the big sound of  the Vegas years.</p>
<p>He can sing anything by this point, it&#8217;s  all in place—band, producers, strings, horns, the Jordanaires. The only  way it can go wrong is the song. When the song is right—<em>I Washed My Hands In Muddy Water</em> (1970, 570)— it&#8217;s perfect. When it&#8217;s wrong <em>l&#8217;ll Take You Home Again Kathleen</em> (1971, 615) it just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Elvis is making me cry with regularity  now, no-one hits a note of drunk self-pity better and even when you&#8217;re  not inebriated you can remember those pissed moments when the only man  that can understand how wronged you are is Elvis Aaron Presley. Well,  him and Him. For we get that gospel thread back at this stage.</p>
<p>I spent most of my time at this point  musing not on lyrical content, for Elvis is long past hiding behind  anything the truth (whoever is writing) is laid bare, but on how Elvis  is very much a religious figure. If my experience is coloured by the  traditional Irish household I first heard Elvis records in, then perhaps  that&#8217;s it. I see the EAP, JFK, and the Pope as the parts of a Catholic  trinity almost as holy to people in the late seventies as the &#8216;real&#8217;  one. It&#8217;s something to to with the redemptive power of song, the way in  which Elvis confesses every  sin—all  borne through love—powerfully and honestly. Though they are others&#8217;  words, it&#8217;s Elvis&#8217;s truth. The greatest interpreter of song and emotion  ever.</p>
<p>It takes Elvis 690 songs before he has a knock at <em>Danny Boy</em> (1976, 690) and it breaks the spell a little. Drawn in to the  religiosity and expanse, I&#8217;m not buying that sentimental guff and it&#8217;s  obvious that his heart isn&#8217;t in it.</p>
<p><em>Way Down</em> (1976, 698) picks me  up—despite containing the lowest note sung by a human on a recorded  release by J.D.Summer— it&#8217;s a fitting end. I still love Elvis.</p>
<p>I tweeted throughout the experience at <a href="http://twitter.com/elvismarathon">@elvismarathon</a>, <a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0Am4gcy6FBVNBdHBkb0pQcWxWalRRMmlfMUE5ZHpjeUE&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;output=html">an archive of the Tweets is here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/abY4n4">A Spotify playlist of my &#8216;discoveries&#8217; is here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/884/the-king-and-i-%e2%80%94%c2%a0my-elvis-marathon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Sunday, and Saturday, with Sidie</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/870/one-sunday-and-saturday-with-sidie/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/870/one-sunday-and-saturday-with-sidie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Sidebottom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gavin wray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jug of Ale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moseley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variety is back]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really can&#8217;t put my finger on where I first came across Frank Sidebottom, logic would dictate that I&#8217;d have spied him on one of his regular appearances on Number 73 but there aren&#8217;t any memories I can dredge up. I know I watched it every so often, but apart from the theme tune there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t put my finger on where I first came across Frank Sidebottom, logic would dictate that I&#8217;d have spied him on one of his regular appearances on <em>Number 73</em> but there aren&#8217;t any memories I can dredge up. I know I watched it every so often, but apart from the theme tune there&#8217;s nothing on any cortex I can connect to, maybe the ungodly presence of both Sandi Toksvig and Neil Buchanan has led to a form of repressed memory syndrome.</p>
<p>I guess it may have been one of the famous (how many other TV guest spots have songs written about them?) <em>Match of the Day</em> episodes — both when <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y03oegsWCc0&amp;feature=related">Altrincham were doing &#8220;well in the F.A. Cup&#8221;</a> — or perhaps it was when he was booted from <em>The James Whale Show</em>, I used to watch all sorts of crap. Getting the Spanish archer from what was such a disorganised show was an achievement that later touring partner Charlie Chuck never managed, proof perhaps of an anarchy of spirit belied by the colouring pens and deference to his elders.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember the first time I saw or heard Frank Sidebottom, it&#8217;s sort of like he&#8217;s always existed. But I do remember the first time I met him, or Chris Sievey to be pedantic.</p>
<p>The battered leather aviator&#8217;s jacket didn&#8217;t identify him, nor did the mess of black oiled curly hair or the ever so slightly bulbous nose — mind you I had absolutely no idea what Chris (as opposed to Frank) looked like at all. However there were no other middle-aged men sitting outside New Street Station with luggage big enough to house a Casio keyboard, and the boxy suitcase had a suspicious papier-mâché head shaped bulge. &#8220;Chris?&#8221;, I said. It was him</p>
<p>The Reading Festival has always been the strangest mainstream gig in the British summer calendar, a three-day festival where the rock hangover meant that it was completely possible to go and find yourself after two days of indie&#8217;s finest suddenly confronted with a sea of plaid shirts and not a single discernible tune. So that&#8217;s the reason I was in the comedy tent that Sunday evening in 1995 and instead of seeing Neil Young muscularly backed by a lumpen Pearl Jam, was shouting &#8220;spiders!&#8221; in an attempt to put off the apparently arachnophobic singer. Frank was leading that, and I was as smitten as one man can be with another who has a perfectly spherical fake head.</p>
<p><a href="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/Preview.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-871" title="Preview" src="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/Preview.jpg" alt="Variery Is Back poster" width="461" height="650" /></a></p>
<p>So that was why, almost ten years later I&#8217;d bullied — apparently — the man out of semi-retirement to play a hugely shambolic gig upstairs in a pub in Moseley. We, mate Gavin and I, were intent on &#8220;bringing back Variety&#8221; and after one, equally shambolic but way less good, night (band, comedian, raffle, bingo essentially) we&#8217;d decided that the only act that could top it was Timperley&#8217;s finest. I&#8217;d stumbled on a fantastic set of arty pictures of Frank online and established a route in via the photographer.</p>
<p>So, after a gushing phone call in which the subject of money was only lightly touched upon, Chris reckoned that Frank would be able to make it, that he was looking to get back into showbiz, and that £250 and a cut of the door was plenty.</p>
<p>As I drove him to the venue he talked non-stop: about other gigs he&#8217;d done in Birmingham, asking after Dave Travis, about Tony Wilson and the Channel Four show <em>Remote Control</em>. There was one anecdote about how he&#8217;d made an African tribesman Frank and it hadn&#8217;t gone down well with the director, it was brilliant stuff that I couldn&#8217;t do justice even if I could remember it.</p>
<p>The show was the most disorganised I ever saw Frank perform, crawling along the floor pushing his suitcase, interrupting my weak-assed comedy turn as a camp NUM shop-steward (don&#8217;t ask), going off after a couple of songs so as to encore all night — fantastic. He even pinched my backing band Wedge Grundy and the Big Rons for a medley of hits where they didn&#8217;t know the chords. That was okay though, because Frank didn&#8217;t know the words and it became the funniest jazz-funk work-out I&#8217;ve ever seen — as well as the only one I&#8217;ve ever watched all the way through.</p>
<p><a href="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-872" title="Frank at Pat Kav" src="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/1-300x225.jpg" alt="Frank at the Pat Kav" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>Frank was out of practice, not unprofessional, although Chris had definitely had a good drink. We had too, the night was wet with booze, and I even — whisper it — got to try the head on, it didn&#8217;t fit. At this stage I hope it doesn&#8217;t break any illusions to tell you that without the head it was Chris, with it, Frank. Supremely method, but there was one other piece of preparation — Chris would wind electrical tape around his nose, presumably to get the nasal voice just right. I didn&#8217;t have the heart to mention that it made almost no difference to pitch or rhythm.</p>
<p>After the gig we went to the curry house over the road, where Chris held court. He ordered twenty-seven poppadoms, as the World Record was &#8220;twenty-six actually&#8221; — he&#8217;d apparently eaten twenty-five in an restaurant before where he was told of the record: &#8220;I could have  eaten two more but… I couldn&#8217;t be arsed&#8221;. He then picked up the tab for the whole crew, costing almost all of his fee I&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>But the best Chris moment didn&#8217;t come then, nor the next day when he regaled us with tales of Manchester City which drinking shandies made with coke instead of lemonade, nor even when clinking with bottles of Bacardi Breezer he climbed into the back seat of Cookie, our bassist&#8217;s wreck of an MG for a lift back to Timperley and promptly fell right asleep. No, the story that I&#8217;m proud to tell most happened back at Woody (née-Wedge)&#8217;s flat where there was nothing but Prince&#8217;s <em>Purple Rain</em> that would satisfy him — it was played many time that night, and the following morning too when Chris discovered that he needn&#8217;t have slept sitting on a stool in the kitchen &#8220;oh you do have other rooms then&#8221;.</p>
<p>I only met Chris that once although we talked on the phone and over email a bit, most recently to arrange a slot for him on my radio show. But when I heard of the cancer I was upset, and upon hearing the news yesterday I felt an hollowness that I can only match with deaths of people I&#8217;ve known and really cared about, so I think I was touched. I saw Frank quite a bit though, each time at a bigger and better organised gig: Little Civic, Jug of Ale, Wulfrun Hall and on Manchester&#8217;s Channel M and heard him in recent months on <a href="http://www.manchesterradioonline.com/">Manchester Radio Online</a>. He&#8217;d finally got that second Greatest Hits compilation out, the marvellous <a href="http://amzn.to/ahYOti">E,F, G. &amp; H</a>, and seemed to be heading back to something like his peak.</p>
<p><a href="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-873" title="-2" src="http://thebounder.co.uk/files/2010/06/2-300x225.jpg" alt="me and Frank" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>In truth he was rediscovering an old audience, one with more opportunity to enjoy him and more money to pay, rather than developing a huge new one — but it was growing again and he was playing regularly again.</p>
<p>More importantly he was creating again, I&#8217;ve been searching iTunes over and over these last weeks waiting for <em>Three Shirts On My Line</em> (his World Cup anthem) to go live for download. At the moment it hasn&#8217;t yet, but there are Internet People awaiting to propel it into the charts.</p>
<p>Frank never got to do <em>Guess Who&#8217;s Been On Top Of The Pops</em>, although he outlasted the programme, and while the power of the number one has long since faded you can bet that Frank Sidebottom would have loved it. He was pop all the way through.</p>
<p>A giant of light entertainment, and a man I&#8217;m proud to have spent time with. You know I am, I really am.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<blockquote><p>(<a href="http://johnrobb77.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/frank-sidebottom-rip/">John Robb&#8217;s tribute</a> is well worth a read, as is ex-Oh Blimey Big Band-er <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2006/may/31/art.popandrock">Jon Ronson&#8217;s article for the Guardian of 2006</a>, video of the Variety Is Back gig does exist, I shall try to dig it out.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/870/one-sunday-and-saturday-with-sidie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Passion of the Cripes</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/865/the-passion-of-the-cripes/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/865/the-passion-of-the-cripes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Played Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Norvelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaddafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin-Prince Boateng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stan Boardman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve watched an England game on telly this World Cup, apart from a feeling of ennui matched only it seems by Emile Heskey as he spends another match mostly inhaling the pitch, you&#8217;ll have gained two things: The knowledge that what the England team lack is passion, monotone decide-to-be-Irish pundit Andy Townsend will have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve watched an England game on telly this World Cup, apart from a feeling of ennui matched only it seems by Emile Heskey as he spends another match mostly inhaling the pitch, you&#8217;ll have gained two things:</p>
<ul>
<li>The knowledge that what the England team lack is <strong>passion</strong>, monotone decide-to-be-Irish pundit Andy Townsend will have dulled that into you.</li>
<li>A greater-than-before awareness of what Sir Clive Woodward and Nigel Benn look like these days. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66OuJZGDCHE">As they appear with numerous other English champions in an unashamed advert</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Except that they&#8217;re sort of the same thing. One is an ex-player&#8217;s easy statement on a team&#8217;s failure without having to do such things as explain tactics, the other a Danish lager PR machine&#8217;s attempt to associate themselves with football, without having to understand anything about it bar the jingoistic assumptions made by sections of the press.</p>
<p>Passion is an odd thing, it&#8217;s the only piece of the gamut of emotional reaction to sport that advertisers and the media will attempt to engage the public over. You&#8217;ve seen John Barnes, a player torn apart by the press during his playing career for a perceived lack of it held up as someone to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi_64ifLI9U">connect over just how much of it he has</a>. If it can be whipped up to involve some cheap nostalgia so much the better. Barnes&#8217;s appearance is linked to the current wave of re-imagining the golden era of Italy 1990, there&#8217;s even a film out <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/one-night-in-turin-15-1965330.html"><em>One Night In Turin</em></a> based around the tournament — with the tears and kisses and penalty misses that do nothing so much as remind me how much the video from only twenty years ago has degraded.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not quite how I remember that World Cup, the headlines were about how bad things were, not how memorable. It existed as one of the great last sorties of English hooliganism abroad, there was constant footage of it raining plastic glasses and plastic chairs in picturesque squares all over Italy. The film is based on a book by Pete Davis called <em>All Played Out</em> (<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0224083341?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thekittenchan-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=19450&amp;creativeASIN=0224083341">now re-issued as One Night in Turin</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=thekittenchan-21&amp;l=as2&amp;o=2&amp;a=0224083341" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />), which is a fantastic, if depressing, read about how Planet Football is divorced from all reality and the lives of the fans. Davis quotes a distressed Englishman — no doubt dressed in too-small shorts and one of those headache inducing plastic flat-caps we used to have — after a disappointing draw against North African opposition: &#8220;fight you bastards&#8221; he says &#8220;like we fight for you&#8221;. Sound familiar? The film doesn&#8217;t touch too much on that.</p>
<p>Do players really have less passion now than two decades ago, and if so can that role-call of famous English help. Can a naked-from-the-waist (up, thankfully) Jeff Stelling inspire, does our greatest living World Champion — The Power — chucking a &#8216;good arra&#8217; mean anything to our current team? I&#8217;m not sure it goes far enough, these are media savvy young men who will assume well wishes from the stars of stage and green (and have you noticed Steve Davis CGI&#8217;d into recent transmissions?). What they need is inspirational figures alongside them when it really counts.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s said that the great Liverpool team of the 80s could afford to play Sammy Lee as they &#8220;could have covered for Thora Hird at left back&#8221;, never mind a player who&#8217;d just been transferred a little above his ability. So with that in mind, can&#8217;t the England team cover for the lack of experience or fitness of a sententious Englishman who will lead them in all things passion?</p>
<p>If Beckham can travel without being fit to play, surely the presence of a great who can play (without them being able to really play) is a possibility. And we could stick them on the wing that Gerrard doesn&#8217;t seem to be using anyway.</p>
<p>Of the advert crew, we have to excuse Dames Holmes and MacArthur for FIFA are not enlightened enough to allow a female winger, but surely Ian Botham could do a job? Beefy is so English that supposedly preferring the charms of the West Indian dressing room to that of his own team hasn&#8217;t dampened his iconic status, and he had a few games for Scunthorpe and Yeovil too.</p>
<p>He can&#8217;t do everything of course, but not every game needs so much of the passion and we have a lot of national treasures around. An easy qualifier against the Faroes for example might only need the passion of a Bradley Walsh or a Jonathan Wilkes, a friendly against a local side pre a tournament could be the opportunity to rest the big guns and use a Duncan Norvelle or a Stan Boardman (who pioneer Fat Ron Atkinson used extensively in the build up to big Villa games in the nineties).</p>
<p>A vital qualifier away in Turin might be the time to use Brian Blessed, where you could use a home game to blood David Mitchell, maybe he and Robert Webb could be twin raiding wing-backs.</p>
<p>Roy Race knew all about the power of celebrity, and also blow-driers, when he picked Steve Norman and Martin Kemp of <em>Spandau Ballet</em> for Melchester. Imagine the faces of the opposition when we bring on The Actual Mayor Of London for a corner. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWIUp19bBoA">And BoJo has experience</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the World Cup and we need to show that passion, so we need to lay every card we have. Princes William and Harry were in the stands on Friday, and the dressing room after — luckily before anyone touching cloth came in to ask to use the bog — why were they not in the room before, kitted and booted, three lions over their royal right-nipples ready for battle. Where their ancestors lead England into the breach, they could be leading Aaron Lennon onto the bench and playing themselves.</p>
<p>Forget Gaddafi&#8217;s son somehow making the Libya side (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi#Personal_life_and_family">and oddly the squad at Sampadoria)</a>, forget Kevin-Prince Boateng. We might just have found a use for our Royal Family, just not Fergie in charge of the sponsorship deals please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/865/the-passion-of-the-cripes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Cup Willies</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/859/world-cup-willies/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/859/world-cup-willies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a little bit of a paddy on Twitter yesterday after a slew of people were moaning about &#8220;the football&#8221;. &#8220;The football&#8221; in this instance being a fairly easily avoidable pre-World Cup friendly (the pubs would not have been packed, it was isolated on ITV). I just didn&#8217;t see how it was worthy of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a little bit of a paddy on Twitter yesterday after a slew of people were moaning about &#8220;the football&#8221;. &#8220;The football&#8221; in this instance being a fairly easily avoidable pre-World Cup friendly (the pubs would not have been packed, it was isolated on ITV). I just didn&#8217;t see how it was worthy of the disapprobation poured on it.</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t dismiss all of &#8216;art&#8217; or &#8216;science&#8217; (or at least not easily or seriously), but the cultural, historical and social elements of the most popular sport in the World (and its global celebration) are okay to be sniffy about it seems. It&#8217;s disrupting your television viewing, or making your surrogate living room a little too busy for your liking, and that&#8217;s reason enough.</p>
<p>But, dismisser of &#8220;the football&#8221; is that the root cause? Because you seem to associate the sport with the event, the event with the supporting, and the supporters with a conflation people you don&#8217;t much care for.</p>
<p>Because not all football supporters are racist, boorish, loud, suntanned, drunk or even English.</p>
<p>And not everyone will be &#8220;supporting&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some will be watching, sharing, discussing and enjoying the best players in the World — playing for once without too much financial imperative and on a fairly level playing field (no transfers, no buying success). It can be beautiful.</p>
<p>Football exists not only as a sport, but as a metaphor and conduit for society. Ignore if you will, but don&#8217;t dismiss. It&#8217;s not clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/859/world-cup-willies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Electric, Birmingham</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/760/the-electric-birmingham/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/760/the-electric-birmingham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/760/the-electric-birmingham/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Electric, Birmingham Originally uploaded by new folder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/newfolder/3346934644/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3657/3346934644_67d8f3c5bc_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/newfolder/3346934644/">The Electric, Birmingham</a> Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/newfolder/">new folder</a><br />
</span><br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/760/the-electric-birmingham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why haven&#8217;t newspaper clichés evolved?</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/710/why-havent-newspaper-cliches-evolved/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/710/why-havent-newspaper-cliches-evolved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lovely new site doing the rounds called Glum Councillors it&#8217;s dedicated to collecting: &#8220;images of councillors looking glum whilst pointing at holes in the road, wearing hard hats or presenting oversized cheques.&#8221; Uploaded with plasq&#8216;s Skitch! Sites like this and Lolitics are parodying the politicians (and wanabees) — but the poses and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lovely new site doing the rounds called <a href="http://glumcouncillors.tumblr.com/">Glum Councillors</a> it&#8217;s dedicated to collecting:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;images of councillors looking glum whilst pointing at holes in the road, wearing hard hats or presenting oversized cheques.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div class="thumbnail"><a href="http://skitch.com/bounder/b7trn/glum-councillors"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20090901-fxu8hbyhbbu2m1bea2fc8m53i4.preview.jpg" alt="Glum Councillors" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbnail"><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande, Trebuchet, sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial;font-size: 10px;color: #808080">Uploaded with <a href="http://plasq.com/">plasq</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://skitch.com">Skitch</a>!</span></div>
<p>Sites like this and <a href="http://lolitics.co.uk/">Lolitics</a> are parodying the politicians (and wanabees) — but the poses and the tone are those of the local newspaper. It&#8217;s the language that the politicians want to use.</p>
<div class="thumbnail"><a href="http://skitch.com/bounder/b7trj/lolitics"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20090901-faitwh1hppiun724bjrp7ycpx3.preview.jpg" alt="Lolitics" /></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Lucida Grande, Trebuchet, sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial;font-size: 10px;color: #808080">Uploaded with <a href="http://plasq.com/">plasq</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://skitch.com">Skitch</a>!</span></div>
<p>And it&#8217;s now not just politicians, <a href="http://apiln.blogspot.com/">&#8220;local paper poses&#8221; seem to be universal</a>. One of the early big hits on the web was the <a href="http://www.framleyexaminer.com/">Framley Examiner</a>, which took it&#8217;s cue from very local newspapers and got them spot on — but reading it now, not much seems to have changed.</p>
<p>What are the new local paper clichés?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/710/why-havent-newspaper-cliches-evolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hooves up!</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/720/hooves-up/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/720/hooves-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/720/hooves-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hooves up! Originally uploaded by bounder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bounder/3993680760/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2470/3993680760_9d57ec29dd_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em;margin-top: 0px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bounder/3993680760/">hooves up!</a> Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/bounder/">bounder</a><br />
</span><br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/720/hooves-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WWIII Propaganda: Torrent Your MP3s</title>
		<link>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/693/wwiii-propaganda-torrent-your-mp3s/</link>
		<comments>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/693/wwiii-propaganda-torrent-your-mp3s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/693/wwiii-propaganda-torrent-your-mp3s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WWIII Propaganda: Torrent Your MP3s Originally uploaded by Brian Lane Winfield Moore]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctabu/3658779785/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3658779785_b9bd4f3cd5_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em;margin-top: 0px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctabu/3658779785/">WWIII Propaganda: Torrent Your MP3s</a> Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/doctabu/">Brian Lane Winfield Moore</a><br />
</span><br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/693/wwiii-propaganda-torrent-your-mp3s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.480 seconds -->

