Comments on: Geotag the Internet – my rejected 4iP project http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/ the home for all of jon bounds's nonsense Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:12:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Act now to save the hinternet - jon bounds http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/comment-page-1/#comment-208 Act now to save the hinternet - jon bounds Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:07:49 +0000 http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=641#comment-208 [...] due to not being “social”), and thought about tech that could link this stuff up (see my failed 4:iP bid based on geo-search) — but this is the first time a swathe of the web is about to [...] [...] due to not being “social”), and thought about tech that could link this stuff up (see my failed 4:iP bid based on geo-search) — but this is the first time a swathe of the web is about to [...]

]]> By: Jon Bounds http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/comment-page-1/#comment-207 Jon Bounds Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:32:43 +0000 http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=641#comment-207 I think they misunderstood it as being about "local search" — for which it would have benefits, but isn't what it's really about at all. The rejection email mentioned it not being "public service enough" — which is both odd, and confusing when you look at the things thus far funded. I think they misunderstood it as being about “local search” — for which it would have benefits, but isn't what it's really about at all. The rejection email mentioned it not being “public service enough” — which is both odd, and confusing when you look at the things thus far funded.

]]> By: Jon Bounds http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Jon Bounds Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:32:00 +0000 http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=641#comment-390 I think they misunderstood it as being about "local search" u2014 for which it would have benefits, but isn't what it's really about at all. The rejection email mentioned it not being "public service enough" u2014 which is both odd, and confusing when you look at the things thus far funded. I think they misunderstood it as being about “local search” u2014 for which it would have benefits, but isn’t what it’s really about at all. The rejection email mentioned it not being “public service enough” u2014 which is both odd, and confusing when you look at the things thus far funded.

]]> By: Carl Morris http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/comment-page-1/#comment-204 Carl Morris Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:45:14 +0000 http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=641#comment-204 Good idea.<br><br>Did they say why? Good idea.

Did they say why?

]]> By: the bounder - I’m not in a good mood http://thebounder.co.uk/blog/641/geotag-the-internet-my-rejected-4ip-project/comment-page-1/#comment-202 the bounder - I’m not in a good mood Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:46:40 +0000 http://thebounder.co.uk/?p=641#comment-202 [...] the home for all of jon bounds’s nonsense « Geotag the Internet - my rejected 4iP project [...] [...] the home for all of jon bounds’s nonsense « Geotag the Internet – my rejected 4iP project [...]

]]>